Debate Should monarchies be abolished?, live and 1v1 on camera
Outdated privilege or harmless tradition? A debate that spans the UK, the Commonwealth, and every country that still crowns a head of state.
From Britain to Thailand to the Gulf, kings and queens still hold titles and sometimes real power. Supporters call them a unifying tradition above politics, critics call them inherited privilege paid for by the public. It is one of the most argued questions across the English-speaking world.
What each side argues
Abolish
- A neutral head of state stands above party politics
- Tradition and continuity have real value
- Royals draw tourism and soft power
Keep
- Inherited power has no place in a fair society
- It costs the public and entrenches class
- A head of state should be chosen, not born
These are common positions, not the full picture. The best arguments come out live, when someone has to defend them in real time.
How it works
- Check your camera and mic. Debaters go on camera; viewers don't have to.
- Pick the Monarchy topic and get matched with someone taking the opposing side (Abolish vs Keep).
- Debate live in a public room. The audience chats and a challenge timer rotates new debaters in so everyone gets a turn.
- The crowd can flag a debater off or vote to extend the clock.
Frequently asked
How do I debate Monarchy online?
Open Joust, allow your camera and mic, choose the "Monarchy" topic or add it as a tag, and you'll be matched with someone who wants to argue the other side in a live 1v1 video debate.
Do I need an account?
No. Joust is anonymous, so you can watch, chat, and debate without signing up.
Can I just watch instead of debating?
Yes. Anyone can watch a live Monarchy debate, chat with the audience, and join the line to take a seat when a debater leaves.